← All case files
Case file 021Women & temple covenants

Women’s temple covenant: The pledge to obey husbands, softened then removed

Before April 1990, women in the endowment covenanted to “obey the law of their husbands.” The 1990 revision softened this to hearkening to a husband “as he hearkens to the counsel of the Father.” Reports of the January 2019 revision describe removal of the husband clause altogether. Men never made a corresponding covenant toward their wives.

The short answer

Did women once covenant to hearken to their husbands?

Yes. Published transcripts show women covenanting before 1990 to “observe and keep the law of your husband, and abide by his counsel in righteousness,” and from 1990 to “hearken to the counsel of your husband as he hearkens to the counsel of the Father.” Reports of the January 2019 revision describe removal of the husband clause.

Read the earlier source ↗

The defining contrast

The earlier and later records

1990 endowment · independent transcript
“hearken to the counsel of your husband as he hearkens to the counsel of the Father”
Printed p. 120 · excerpt ↗
Later record
January 2019 change · reported account

Women no longer covenant to hearken to their husbands; women and men make the same covenants to God.

Report summary · published May 2019 ↗

Before April 1990

“Obey the law of their husbands”

The published 1984 transcript records the officiator saying: “We will put the sisters under covenant to obey the law of their husbands.” Women then covenanted “that you will each observe and keep the law of your husband, and abide by his counsel in righteousness.” Men at the same altar covenanted to obey the law of God. In the same version Eve says, “Adam, I now covenant to obey your law as you obey our Father.”

Contemporary reporting in April and May 1990 described the removal of “a vow in which women pledged obedience to their husbands.” The 1990 text replaced “the law of your husband” with “the Law of the Lord” and added the conditional hearkening clause.

The earlier wording

The condition matters to the comparison

The published text pairs women’s obedience to the Lord with hearkening to a husband who hearkens to the Father. The men’s corresponding instruction contains no reciprocal obligation to hearken to a wife. The husband condition limits the earlier wording, but does not remove its asymmetry.

The 2019 record

Contemporary reports describe the change

Sandra Tanner’s May 2019 article reproduces the January reporting by Peggy Fletcher Stack and David Noyce that the husband clause had been removed. That report relied on an unnamed attendee. This case links the accessible reproduction rather than presenting it as an official Church transcript.

KUER independently interviewed named participant Sara Vranes about her January 2 temple visit. She described the new language as changing women’s relationship to God in the ceremony. Her account corroborates the experience of a change; it is not a complete script comparison.

Official presentation

The public covenant summary addresses obedience to God

General Handbook section 27.2 presents the law of obedience for members collectively as keeping Heavenly Father’s commandments. It does not reproduce the spoken ceremony.

The Church’s historical explanation distinguishes changes in administration from what it calls consistent central covenants. That classification does not establish that the earlier husband-specific wording was never used.

Finding

What the record establishes

Before April 1990, women in the temple covenanted to obey the law of their husbands, while men covenanted to obey the law of God. The wording was softened in 1990 and, by participant reports, removed in 2019. Women endowed after each revision would not have heard the earlier wording; the published transcripts and contemporary reports preserve it.

Verify the record

Sources and provenance

Document type, dates, and limitations are identified below.

1984 text · independent transcriptionEvolution of the Mormon Temple Ceremony, Appendix A, p. 75

PDF p. 82; the 1990 changes are marked in braces. Comparison and Eve’s covenant discussed on printed pp. 35–36. Not a Church-issued script.

Read source ↗
1990 · archival research excerptsGregory A. Prince research collection, University of Virginia

Reproduces 1990 newspaper reporting on the removed “vow in which women pledged obedience to their husbands.”

Read source ↗
1990 text · independent transcriptionEvolution of the Mormon Temple Ceremony, pp. 120–121

PDF pp. 128–129. Utah Lighthouse Ministry publication by Jerald and Sandra Tanner; provenance discussion on printed p. 59. Not a Church-issued script.

Read source ↗
May 2019 · accessible reproductionSandra Tanner, “More LDS Temple Changes — A Nod to Feminism?”

Opening section reproduces January 2019 reporting by Peggy Fletcher Stack and David Noyce. The quoted report relies on an unnamed attendee; this is a secondary reproduction.

Read source ↗
January 4, 2019 · participant interviewDaysha Eaton, KUER, “LDS Temple Ceremony Updates Aim To Put Women On Equal Footing With Men”

Named participant Sara Vranes discusses her January 2 experience; not a verbatim ritual transcript.

Read source ↗
Current · official public summaryGeneral Handbook § 27.2

Lists endowment covenants collectively; checked September 7, 2026.

Read source ↗
2022 · institutional explanationChurch History Topics: “Adjustments to Temple Work”

The Church’s distinction between administration and central covenants.

Read source ↗