Civil marriage: The one-year sealing wait was discontinued
A signed 2019 First Presidency letter ended the one-year wait for temple sealing after civil marriage where that waiting rule applied.
The short answer
Did marrying civilly once mean waiting a year to be sealed?
Yes, where the waiting rule applied. The First Presidency’s May 6, 2019 letter explicitly identifies the one-year requirement and discontinues it. This is the Church’s own acknowledgment of the former restriction.
The defining contrast
The earlier and later records
Couples covered by the rule had to wait one year after civil marriage before temple sealing.
Record summary · letter, p. 1 ↗“The policy requiring couples who have been married civilly to wait one year before being sealed is now discontinued.”Signed letter, p. 1 ↗
The decision
The restriction ended by written instruction
The letter bears the signatures of Russell M. Nelson, Dallin H. Oaks, and Henry B. Eyring. It permits couples married civilly to be sealed once they receive temple recommends. Its attached questions and answers specify no fixed interval between the ceremonies.
The same document preserves a separate waiting requirement for newly converted members. Ending the civil-marriage delay did not eliminate all preparation or eligibility requirements.
Scope and explanation
Family inclusion and a worldwide policy
The official announcement explains that civil weddings followed by sealing were already allowed in countries requiring a civil ceremony. The change removed the delay in places where it had applied, bringing the policy into alignment across countries.
The Church described the change as allowing families to participate in a civil wedding when some relatives could not enter a temple. It continued to teach the importance of temple sealing.
The present record
The handbook preserves the new permission
General Handbook section 27.3.1 allows couples already married civilly to be sealed when circumstances permit and they are prepared. The relevant change is the removal of a required delay, not a guarantee of temple admission for every wedding guest.
Finding
What the record establishes
The one-year wait was an actual institutional rule. Its removal changed a practical choice facing couples whose families could not all attend a temple wedding.
Verify the record
Sources and provenance
Document type, dates, and limitations are identified below.
Signed letter, p. 1; attached questions and answers, p. 2. The earlier requirement is acknowledged retrospectively in the rescinding directive.
Read source ↗May 6, 2019 · official announcement“Couples Married Civilly Now Authorized for Immediate Temple Marriage”Explains earlier legal exceptions, worldwide alignment, and family participation.
Read source ↗Current · administrative policyGeneral Handbook §§ 27.3–27.3.1Present instructions for civil marriage and sealing; checked September 7, 2026.
Read source ↗